Apropiación y plagio académico: Un estudio de caso sobre una estudiante debutante en la escritura en la educación superior
Abstract The purpose of this text is to describe and analyze the conceptions, points of view and feelings of a student concerning academic plagiarism in which she was involved when working on a reflection article in a teacher training program. Despite its importance in academic writing, this phenomenon has been little explored in research on writing in higher education in Colombia. The qualitative research study, conceived as a case study, shows that incurring in this practice may occur, not as a wilful act of bad faith, but due to other factors such as the inexperience of the writer, the appropriation of the teacher, a pair or an adult, as well as the lack of criteria to use the citation and intertextuality norms, as required by the writing of an academic article and even, due to the pressure to obtain a good grade, etc. In other words, an error in the process of applying the rules of academic writing. Among other conclusions, we propose that plagiarism requires not only a punitive but more diverse and didactic approach that incorporates, on the one hand, the use of extensive writing and learning strategies in the classroom, and, on the other, theories and models for citation and intertextuality as a central element of the academic text. [1] Foreign languages program. Universidad del Valle. Course: Discourse analysis.
This paper aims at describing and analyzing the beliefs, views, and feelings of a student concerning academic plagiarism, in which she incurred when working on a reflection article in a teacher training program. Despite its importance in academic writing, this phenomenon has been little explored in the research on writing in higher education in Colombia. This qualitative research study, designed as a case study, within the framework of academic literacies, shows that incurring in this practice may occur, not as a willful act of bad faith, but due to other factors such as lack of experience on the part of the writer, “appropriation” by the teach-er, a pair or an adult, as well as lack of criteria to properly apply citation rules and intertextual practices, as required when writing papers and, more notably, because of the pressure to get a good grade, etc. Otherwise said, this is a mistake regarding the application of academic writing rules. Among others, we conclude that plagiarism requires not only a punitive approach, but more diverse and di-dactic measures, incorporating, on the one hand, the use of extensive writing and learning strategies in the classroom, and, on the other hand, theories and models for citation, and intertextuality as central elements in academic texts.
Datos bibliográficos
Título traducido: | Appropriation and Scholarly Plagiarism. A Case Study on a Female Student Beginning at Writing in Higher School Appropriation et plagiat à l’université: étude de cas d ́une étudiante s ́initiant à l’écriture académique |
---|---|
Título de la revista: | Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura |
Autor: | Alfonso Vargas-Franco |
Palabras clave: | |
Palabras clave traducidas: | |
Idioma: | Español |
Enlace del documento: | https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ikala/article/view/329781 |
Tipo de recurso: | Documento de revista |
Fuente: | Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura; Vol 24, No 1 (Año 2019). |
DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n01a08 |
Entidad editora: | Universidad de Antioquia |
Derechos de uso: | Reconocimiento - NoComercial - CompartirIgual (by-nc-sa) |
Áreas de conocimiento / Materias: | Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades --> Lengua y Lingüística |
Datos estadísticos
- Visualizaciones
- Consultas
- Estilo Citación
- Compartir
- Exportar registro
- Favoritos
Datos bibliométricos
WOS
Datos Índice REDIB (Beta)
- Total citas emitidas
- Total citas recibidas
Documentos citados: |
Brooke, R. (1988). Modeling a Writer’s Identity: Reading and imitation in the Writing classroom. College Composition and Communication 39, pp. 24-41. Canagarajah, S. (2002). A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Cassany, D. (2016). La escritura extensiva. La enseñanza de la expresión escrita en secundaria. Enunciación 21 (1), 91-106. Fernández López, M.C. y López Gil, K. (2017). Búsqueda, selección y uso de información digital de estudiantes universitarios en la escritura de textos académicos. Ponencia. X Foro Educadores para la era digital. Portal Educativo OEA, pp. 1-15. Gee, J.P. (1996). Sociolinguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: Taylor & Francis [Second Edition, 2007]. Horner, B. (1999). The “Birth” of “Basic Writing”. En, B. Horner y M. Zhan Lu. (editores) (pp. 3-29). Representing the “Other”. Basic Writers and the Teaching of Basic Writing. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English. Horner, B. y Zhan Lu, M. (1999). Introduction. En, B. Horner y M. Zhan Lu. (editores) (pp. xi-xx). Representing the “Other”. Basic Writers and the Teaching of Basic Writing. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English. Howard, R. M. (1992). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11 (2), 233-245. Howard, R. M. y Jamieson, S. (2014). Researched Writing. En, G. Tate, A, Rupiper Taggart, A., K.Schick, y H. Hessler Brooke (pp. 231-247). A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and Identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Jones, C., Turner, J. y Street, B. (1999). Introduction. En, C. Jones, J. Turner y B. Street (Edited by) Students Writing in the university. Cultural and epistemological issues (pp. xv-xxiv). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Lea, M. R. (1999). Academic Literacies and Learning in Higher Education. Constructing knowledge through texts and experience. En, C. Jones, J. Turner y B. Street (Edited by) Students Writing in the university. Cultural and epistemological issues (pp. 103-124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Lea, M. y Street, B. (1999). Writing as academic literacies: understanding textual practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 11 (3), 182-199. Lea, M. y Stierer, B. (Eds.) (1999). New Contexts for student writing in higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Lillis, T. (2001). Student Writing. Access, Regulation, Desire. New York: Routledge. Matsuda, P. y Hammill, M. (2014). Second Language Writing Pedagogy. En, G. Tate, A, Rupiper Taggart, A., K.Schick, y H. Hessler Brooke (pp. 266-282). A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. McBride, K. (2012). ‘Pachwriting’ is more common tan plagiarism, just as dishonest. Poynter. A global leader in Journalism [https://www.poynter.org/news/patchwriting-more-common-plagiarism-just-dishonest. Descargado el día 15 de noviembre de 2017]. Ochoa S., L. y Cueva Lobelle, A. (2014). El plagio y su relación con los procesos de escritura académica. Forma y Función, 27 (2), pp. 95-113. Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic Writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. Londres: Continuum. Prior, P. A. y Lunsford, K.J. (2007). History of Reflection, Theory, and Research on Writing. En, Ch. Bazerman, (Edited by). Handbook of Research on Writing. History, Society, School, Individual, Text (pp. 81-96). New York/London: Routledge. Prior, P. A. (2009). Writing /Disciplinarity. A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. New York/London: Routledge [First edition, 1998]. Reyes, G. (1999). Cómo escribir bien en español. Manual de redacción. Madrid: Arco Libros. Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review. A Step-byStep Guide for Students. London/Thousands Oaks: Sage. Rojas Chavarro, M. A. y Olarte Collazos, J.M. (2010). Plagio en el ámbito académico. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología, 38 (4), 537-538. Shaughnessy, M.P. (1977). Errors & Expectations. A Guide for the teacher of Basic Writing. New York: Oxford University Press. Sommers, N (1982). Responding to student writers. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-156. Soto Rodríguez, A. (2012). El plagio y su impacto a nivel académico y profesional. Revista E-Ciencias de la Información, 2 (1), 2-13. Stake, R.E. (2007). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata [Título original: The Art of Case Study Research, 1995. Primera edición en español, 1998]. Sureda, J., Comas, R. y Morey, M. (2009). Las causas del plagio académico entre el alumnado universitario, según el profesorado. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 50, 197-220. Teberosky, A. (2007). El texto académico. En, M. Castelló (coord.). Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 17-46). Barcelona: Graó. Weese, K.l. (2010). Learning From Students: An Approach to Teaching Beginning College Writers. En, K.L. Weese, S.L. Fox y S. Greene (Edited by). Teaching Academic Literacy. The uses of Teacher-Research in Developing a Writing Program (pp. 3-19). New York/London: Routledege [First edition, 1999]. Zavala, V. (2009). ¿Quién está diciendo eso?: literacidad académica, identidad y poder en la educación superior”. En, J. Kalman y B. Street (coordinadores). Lectura, escritura y matermáticas como prácticas sociales. Diálogos con América Latina (p. 348-363). México: CEFRAL. Siglo XXI. Zavala, V. (2011). La escritura académica y la agencia de los sujetos. Cuadernos Comillas. Revista Internacional de Aprendizaje del Español. Fundación Comillas. El Español escrito en contextos contemporáneos. Monográfico 1, 52-66 Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic Writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. Londres: Continuum. Prior, P. A. y Lunsford, K.J. (2007). History of Reflection, Theory, and Research on Writing. En, Ch. Bazerman, (Edited by). Handbook of Research on Writing. History, Society, School, Individual, Text (pp. 81-96). New York/London: Routledge. Prior, P. A. (2009). Writing /Disciplinarity. A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. New York/London: Routledge [First edition, 1998]. Reyes, G. (1999). Cómo escribir bien en español. Manual de redacción. Madrid: Arco Libros. Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review. A Step-byStep Guide for Students. London/Thousands Oaks: Sage. Rojas Chavarro, M. A. y Olarte Collazos, J.M. (2010). Plagio en el ámbito académico. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología, 38 (4), 537-538. Shaughnessy, M.P. (1977). Errors & Expectations. A Guide for the teacher of Basic Writing. New York: Oxford University Press. Sommers, N (1982). Responding to student writers. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-156. Stake, R.E. (2007). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata [Título original: The Art of Case Study Research, 1995. Primera edición en español, 1998]. Teberosky, A. (2007). El texto académico. En, M. Castelló (coord.). Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias (pp. 17-46). Barcelona: Graó. Turell, M.T. (2007). Plagio y traducción literaria. Vasos Comunicantes. Revista de ACE Traductores, 37, 43-54. Turner, J. (1999). Academic Literacy and the Discourse of Transparency. En, C. Jones, J. Turner y B. Street (Edited by) Students Writing in the university. Cultural and epistemological issues (pp. 149-160). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Vaamonde, J.D. y Omar, A. (2008). La deshonestidad académica como un constructo multidimensional. Revista para la agenda educativa nacional. RLEE. México, XXXVIII, (3 y 4), 7-27. Vargas, A. y Cassany, D. (2011). Revisión entre iguales y escritura académica: lo que dicen los sujetos y las prácticas. XVI Congreso Internacional de la ALFAL. Memorias, pp. 1809-1816. Vargas, A. (2015a). Escritura académica e identidad en la educación superior. Un enfoque sociocultural. Medellín: Fondo Editorial Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano. Nelson, N. (2007). The Reading-Writing Nexus in Discourse Research. En, En, Ch. Bazerman, (Edited by). Handbook of Research on Writing. History, Society, School, Individual, Text (pp. 435-450). New York/London: Routledge. McBride, K. (2012). ‘Pachwriting’ is more common tan plagiarism, just as dishonest. Poynter. A global leader in Journalism [https://www.poynter.org/news/patchwriting-more-common-plagiarism-just-dishonest. Descargado el día 15 de noviembre de 2017]. Brooke, R. (1988). Modeling a Writer’s Identity: Reading and imitation in the Writing classroom. College Composition and Communication 39, pp. 24-41. Canagarajah, S. (2002). A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Chartier, R. (2011). Libro y lectura en el mundo digital. En, G. Cavallo y R. Chartier (editores). Historia de la lectura en el mundo occidental (pp. 13-24). Madrid: Taurus [Primera edición, 1997]. Domínguez Aroca, Ma. I. (2012). Lucha contra el plagio desde las bibliotecas universitarias. El profesional de la información, 21 (5), 498-503. Gee, J.P. (1996). Sociolinguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: Taylor & Francis [Second Edition, 2007]. Horner, B. y Zhan Lu, M. (1999). Introduction. En, B. Horner y M. Zhan Lu. (editores) (pp. xi-xx). Representing the “Other”. Basic Writers and the Teaching of Basic Writing. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English. Howard, R. M. (1992). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11 (2), 233-245. Howard, R. M. y Jamieson, S. (2014). Researched Writing. En, G. Tate, A, Rupiper Taggart, A., K.Schick, y H. Hessler Brooke (pp. 231-247). A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and Identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Jones, C., Turner, J. y Street, B. (1999). Introduction. En, C. Jones, J. Turner y B. Street (Edited by) Students Writing in the university. Cultural and epistemological issues (pp. xv-xxiv). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Lea, M. R. (1999). Academic Literacies and Learning in Higher Education. Constructing knowledge through texts and experience. En, C. Jones, J. Turner y B. Street (Edited by) Students Writing in the university. Cultural and epistemological issues (pp. 103-124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Lea, M. y Street, B. (1999). Writing as academic literacies: understanding textual practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 11 (3), 182-199. Lea, M. y Stierer, B. (Eds.) (1999). New Contexts for student writing in higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Lillis, T. (2001). Student Writing. Access, Regulation, Desire. New York: Routledge. Matsuda, P. y Hammill, M. (2014). Second Language Writing Pedagogy. En, G. Tate, A, Rupiper Taggart, A., K.Schick, y H. Hessler Brooke (pp. 266-282). A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zavala, V. (2011). La escritura académica y la agencia de los sujetos. Cuadernos Comillas. Revista Internacional de Aprendizaje del Español. Fundación Comillas. El Español escrito en contextos contemporáneos. Monográfico 1, 52-66 |
---|