Mobilidade na Gestão de Projetos
Mobilidade na Gestão de Projetos
Revista de Gestão e Projetos - GeP
O desenvolvimento de projetos é fundamental para o funcionamento diário de qualquer organização. No entanto, muitos projetos nem sempre têm os resultados esperados. Entre os fatores que influenciam o desempenho dos projetos está o monitoramento e controle eficaz e eficiente. O objetivo deste trabalho é investigar a maneira pela qual o uso de tecnologias móveis nos processos de monitoramento e controle do projeto afeta o desempenho do mesmo. Os resultados obtidos indicam uma relação positiva entre o uso de tecnologias móveis no monitoramento e controle de projetos e desempenho do mesmo, particularmente em termos de cumprimento do cronograma planejado.
The development of projects is fundamental to the daily functioning of any organization. However, many projects do not always have the expected results. Amongst the factors that influence the performance of projects is their effective and efficient monitoring and control. The aim of this paper is to investigate the way in which the use of mobile technologies in the processes of project monitoring and control affects project performance. The research methodology adopted consists of an exploratory phase (qualitative, with interviews) and an explanatory phase (quantitative – via a survey), and this article will emphasize the qualitative results obtained in the latter. The research data indicate a positive relation between the use of mobile technologies in monitoring and control of projects and project performance, particularly in terms of working within the planned schedule.
Bibliographic data
| Translated title: | Mobility in Project Management |
|---|---|
| Journal Title: | Revista de Gestão e Projetos - GeP |
| First author: | Everton Roberto Comin |
| Other Authors: | Amarolinda Zanela Klein; Eduardo Henrique Rigoni |
| Palabras clave: | |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Get full text: | http://www.revistagep.org/ojs/index.php/gep/article/view/256 |
| Resource type: | Journal Article |
| Source: | Revista de Gestão e Projetos - GeP; Vol 5, No 2 (Year 2014). |
| DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/10.5585 |
| Publisher: | Universidade Nove de Julho |
| Usage rights: | Reconocimiento - NoComercial (by-nc) |
| Categories: | Social Sciences/Humanities --> Business |
Statistical data
- Views
- Consultations
- Citation style
- Share
- Export record
- Favourites
| Bibliography: | Basole, R. C., & Rouse, W. B. (2006). Mobile Enterprise Readiness and Transformation. Idea Group Inc. IGI. Battard, N., & Mangematin, V. (2013). Idiosyncratic distances: Impact of mobile technology practices on role segmentation and integration. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 231-242. Fretty, P. (2006). Why do projects really fail. PM Network, 20(3), 45-48. Gale, S. F. (2011). Failure rates finally drop. PM Network, 25(8), 10-11. Yang, L. R., Chen, J. H., & Huang, C. F. (2012). Requirements definition and management practice to improve project outcomes. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 18(1), 114-124. Ika, L. A., Diallo, A., & Thuillier, D. (2012). Critical success factor for world bank projects: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Project Management, 30(1), 105-116. Kalakota, R., & Robinson, M. (2002). M-business: tecnologia móvel e estratégia de negócios. Porto Alegre: Bookman. Lauras, M., Marques, G., & Gourc, D. (2010). Towards a multi-dimensional project performance measurement system. Decision Support Systems, 48(2), 342-353. Okabayashi, A., Bruno, M. A. C., & Sbragia, R. (2008). Excelência no gerenciamento de construção de hidrelétrica de grande porte. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 9(6), 11-25. PMBOK. (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. [Manual]. Global Standard. Campus Boulevnad: Newtown Square. Qureshi, T. M., Warraich, A. S., & Hijazi, S. T. (2009). Significance of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 378-388. Saccol, A. Z., & Reinhard, N. (2007). Tecnologias de informação móveis, sem fio e ubíquas: definições, estado-da-arte e oportunidades de pesquisa. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 11(2), 175-198. Scornavacca, E., & Barnes, S. J. (2008). The strategic value of enterprise mobility: Case study insights. Information, Knowledge, Systems Management, 7(1), 227-241. Shaker, K. (2010). Why do projects really fail, PM Network, 24(7), 20-21. Sorensen, C. (2011). Enterprise mobility: tiny technology with global impact on work. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Turner, J. R. (2007). The Gower Handbook of Project Management. Aldershot: Gower. Yeton, P., Martin, A., Sharma, R., & Johnston, K. (2000). A model of information systems development project performance. Information Systems Journal, 10(4), 263-289. Yuan, Y., Archer, N., Connelly, C. E., & Zheng, W. (2010). Identifying the ideal fit between mobile work and mobile work support. Information and Management, 47(3), 125-137. Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004). How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 289-321. Webster, F. M., & Knutson, J. (2005). The AMA handbook of project management. 2 ed. ISBN 0-8144-7271-0. Wi, H., & Jung, M. (2010). Modeling and analysis of project performance factors in an extended project-oriented virtual organization (EProVO). Expert System with Applications, 37(2), 1143-1151. |
|---|